NDT.org Home Companies NewsJobs Message Board Archives

NDT Forums Nondestructive Testing Forums
Forums for Inspection and Nondestructive Testing
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Attention:
All new members will require authorization for membership before being allowed to log on.
To get authorization:
1. RegisterRegister on forums.ndt.org.
2. Send an email to webmaster@ndt.org with the subject "ndt.org board authorization." In the body of the message, include your username that you registered with, name, company, and city.
3. Your registration will be authorized and you will be allowed to log in.
4. Users who registered before 6/1/06 will also need to send an email to get authorized.

Variance in ECT results during tube inspection of stripper

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NDT Forums Nondestructive Testing Forums Forum Index -> ET - Electromagnetic Testing
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ranjeet singh_tcl



Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 2
Location: India

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 9:27 pm    Post subject: Variance in ECT results during tube inspection of stripper Reply with quote

We are operating Fertilizer plant at India.During Annual Turn-round 2006 one of our vertical exchanger stripper's tubes were inspected by using eddy current test .
: Details of heat exchanger is as follows,
: Falling film type vertical heat exchanger
: Media in the tube-Ammonium carbamate
: Materail of tube-Titanium gr-3
: Results of eddy current were very surprising as it was found more than 60% gradual wall loss in more than 25% tube.Management had started thinking about its replacement in the coming year.As it was surprsing that after 10 year of operation results were such.But then it was decided to pull ot one of the tube to check ECT worthiness.
: After pull out it was inspected from inside/outside and pieces were cut to measure its bore using bore gauge.Measurement showed that reduction is not more than 40%.
: Also its wall thickness was measured using ultrasonic thickness gauge,whcih also confirmed the bore gauge results.
: Calibartion tube and its artificail flaws were made as ASME section-V.
: ECT instrument was confirming the calibartion tube but not exchanger tube.
: I would like to no possible reasons,which caused such deviation.
:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NDT Forums Nondestructive Testing Forums Forum Index -> ET - Electromagnetic Testing All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group